Skip to main content

The "Relation Back Doctrine" Failed When Plaintiff Was Unable To Show That A "Unity Of Interest" Existed

By Bashian & Papantoniou
March 14, 2011

The  Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 4th Department  held that an owner of underground cables failed to establish that a new defendant was vicariously liable for original defendant’s alleged damage to cables, and as a result there was no unity of interest between the new and original defendants as required for owner to assert claim against new defendant (after expiration of the statute limitations period) under the “relation back doctrine.”   Under the “relation back doctrine,” a claim may be brought against a new defendant, despite the expiration of the statute of limitations, when the new defendant is united in interest with the original defendant and as a result of such relationship, it can be found that as a result of  notice of the original lawsuit, the new defendant will not be prejudiced in its defense on the merits in the new action.   Read  Verizon New York, Inc. v. Labarge Brothers Co., Inc.

Category: Litigation
  • Related Posts

    09 February 2026
    Why You Should Never Sign an Employment Agreement Without an Attorney’s Review
  • Related Posts

    26 January 2026
    Defending Personal Injury Claims Against Real Property When Uninsured: A New York Property Owner’s Guide
  • Related Posts

    17 December 2025
    Corporate M&A for First-Timers: What to Expect (Without the Jargon)