Skip to main content

Family Law: Modification Of Child Custody Order To Permit Custodial Father To Move With Child To Thailand Was In Best Interests

By Bashian & Papantoniou
February 13, 2011

Practice Areas

Resourses

A father, who resided in Pennsylvania and had primary physical custody of his child, cross-petitioned for a modification of a child custody order which would permit him to move with the child from Pennsylvania to Thailand.  Under New York law, a party seeking relocation of his or her child must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the relocation would be in the child’s best interests.   In this case, the Family Court credited the father’s explanation for moving of desiring to keep his family intact; his current spouse had been offered a transfer by the French corporation for which she worked, with lucrative pay and benefits.   While recognizing that the move would severely restrict the birth mother’s parenting time, the Family Court observed that such restriction might be positive for the child since the birth mother (and her parents) had frequently engaged in behavior that had a harmful effect on the child.   This included repeated derogatory comments about the father, attempts to manipulate the child to say negative things about the father, and the frequent use of profanity around the child.  The father won the modification and mother appealed.  On appeal, the  Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department  affirmed the Family Court’s decision and held that the modification of a child custody order to permit the custodial father to move with the child to Thailand was in the  best interests of the child .  Hissam v. Mancini
Category: Family Law

  • Related Posts

    28 May 2025
    Securing a $2.7 Million Award: Bashian & Papantoniou Delivers Justice for its Client
    Read More

  • Related Posts

    21 March 2025
    Bashian & Papantoniou, P.C. Secures Summary Judgment for Fire Mechanics, Protecting Small Business from Meritless Claims
    Read More

  • Related Posts

    11 March 2025
    Court Issues Default Decision Against Defendant Ricardo McGregor in Commercial Fraud Case
    Read More