Skip to main content

Can Attorneys View And Access Facebook Page Of A Party Other Than His Or Her Client In A Pending Litigation

By Bashian & Papantoniou
April 19, 2011

The  New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics in Opinion 843  ruled that an “attorney may ethically view and access the  Facebook  and  MySpace  profiles of a party other than the lawyer’s client in  litigation  as long as the party’s profile is available to all members in the network.”   On the other hand, the Committee  ruled that a lawyer is prohibited by the  Professional Rules of Conduct  from requesting the adverse party to be its  “friend” or directing an unrelated third-party to do so on its behalf (this would violate Rule 8.4 which prohibits deceptive or misleading conduct).  The Committee reasoned that an attorney which “friends” a  represented  party in a pending litigation runs afoul of Rule 4.2 (the “no-contact rule”) which strictly prohibits attorneys from communicating with a represented party, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so.  A lawyer that attempts to “friend” an  unrepresented  party is in violation of Rule 4.3, which prohibits an attorney from giving legal advice to a  pro-se  litigant (an unrepresented party) for purposes other than advice that it secure legal counsel.  Therefore, if you are in a pending litigation and your Facebook or MySpace page is public, an opposing attorney can access your social networking page to obtain information to be used against you in a pending lawsuit.    If you are being sued or believe that you may have a viable legal claim against another, please call  Erik M. Bashian , an experienced New York trial attorney to discuss.

Category: Litigation
  • Related Posts

    28 May 2025
    Securing a $2.7 Million Award: Bashian & Papantoniou Delivers Justice for its Client
  • Related Posts

    21 March 2025
    Bashian & Papantoniou, P.C. Secures Summary Judgment for Fire Mechanics, Protecting Small Business from Meritless Claims
  • Related Posts

    11 March 2025
    Court Issues Default Decision Against Defendant Ricardo McGregor in Commercial Fraud Case